Texas' junk science law scrutinized in Robert Roberson's case, involving questionable forensic evidence and justice reform concerns.

Texas' junk science law is under scrutiny in the case of Robert Roberson, who was convicted partly based on questionable forensic evidence. Advocates argue that the law, designed to prevent unreliable scientific testimony in court, needs reform to ensure justice. Roberson's situation highlights ongoing concerns about the integrity of forensic science in the legal system.

October 20, 2024
56 Articles

Further Reading