Queensland cattle farmers use virtual fencing to save labor and cut costs, despite high initial fees.

Queensland cattle producers, including Peter Marles near Gin Gin, are adopting virtual fencing to tackle labor shortages and high infrastructure costs. Though upfront expenses—around $70,000 for 200 head plus $6,000 yearly data fees—are high, the system offers remote management via smartphone, dynamic paddock adjustments, and reduced mustering needs. Unlike traditional fencing costing $4,400–$7,700 per km, virtual fencing provides greater grazing flexibility and better pasture use, making it a strategic choice for producers prioritizing labor savings and operational agility over long-term physical assets.