Learn languages naturally with fresh, real content!

Popular Topics
Explore By Region
OpenAI’s broad subpoenas in its lawsuit against Musk spark criticism over chilling free speech and undermining nonprofit mission.
Seven nonprofits criticizing OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model say the company issued broad subpoenas in its lawsuit against Elon Musk, demanding donor info, communications involving Musk and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, and governance details—despite most groups having no direct link to the case.
Critics, including Public Citizen’s Robert Weissman, call the move intimidation meant to silence dissent and chill free speech.
OpenAI defends the subpoenas as necessary legal defense actions, asserting its mission to benefit humanity remains intact, though opponents fear profit motives could override its original nonprofit goals.
The legal battle stems from Musk’s claim that OpenAI violated its mission by pursuing profit, while OpenAI counters that Musk seeks to control AI innovation.
Internal concerns have surfaced, with OpenAI’s Joshua Achiam acknowledging accountability issues.
Los amplios citatorios de OpenAI en su demanda contra Musk provocaron críticas por enfriar la libertad de expresión y socavar la misión sin fines de lucro.