Scientists advocate for experiential learning in science education, yet emphasize it's not a substitute for core knowledge; deep comprehension is essential.

Scientists advocate for incorporating experiential learning, like licking an ice lolly, into science education to enhance understanding of concepts like melting. While these sensory experiences can aid memory, they are not substitutes for foundational knowledge. True learning requires connecting experiences to broader concepts, as emphasized by John Dewey. Over-reliance on gimmicks risks superficial understanding; deeper comprehension is essential for applying scientific knowledge effectively.

September 04, 2024
5 Articles

Further Reading