Chaplains view tactical-level drone strikes as most legitimate, differing from citizens' preference for over-the-horizon strikes.
Military chaplains view tactical-level drone strikes on battlefields as the most legitimate, differing from U.S. citizens who perceive over-the-horizon strikes without external oversight as most legitimate. The chaplains' legitimacy paradox arises from concerns including legalities, intelligence accuracy, territorial integrity, and national security implications. The study's findings may influence policy, strategy, and military tactics in the use of drones.
May 08, 2024
3 Articles