London judge ruled that the UK government did not irrationally strip Prince Harry of security privileges.

London judge Peter Lane ruled that the UK government did not act irrationally in stripping Prince Harry of security privileges after he left the royal family and moved to the US. The judge found that the February 2020 decision to provide security on an as-needed basis for the Duke of Sussex was not unlawful, irrational, or unjustified. Prince Harry plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) acted irrationally and failed to follow its own policies concerning risk analysis for his safety.

February 28, 2024
90 Articles